Live economics
Tariff, CAPEX, yield, OPEX and financing assumptions are available.
Focused project-finance decision map
For a live renewable energy project where the next question is not “what does the model say?” but “what is actually stopping this financing case from working, and what should change first?”
The output
The review starts from the financing question and isolates the likely binding constraint: coverage, tariff, CAPEX, leverage, tenor, returns, cash timing or a risk-allocation issue that the simple ratios do not capture.
When it fits
The 48-hour target applies after scope is confirmed and the agreed non-confidential or NDA-protected inputs are available.
Tariff, CAPEX, yield, OPEX and financing assumptions are available.
You need to proceed, renegotiate, resize, defer or reject.
The objective is to isolate the financing gap, not rebuild every schedule from scratch.
If the answer depends on a full model rebuild or contract review, the next scope is explicit.
Internal IP boundary
The public site exposes enough deterministic logic to let a prospective client test the method. The deeper Bankability Gap Solver is used inside the paid review and is not published as a generic calculator.
That internal layer can incorporate period cash flows, debt sculpting, tax, reserves, payment delays, construction timing, degradation, PPA protections, lender covenants and the real feasibility of each proposed change.
Start with fit
Use Project Fit if you are unsure of the scope, or send the brief if the project assumptions and decision are already clear.